Walking The Talk: The Local Community's Engagement Spectrum With The Local Government Unit Programs And Policies
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study focuses on the community engagement of residents towards implementing programs and policies of the local government unit in the province of Cotabato. The residents shared their experiences with the community engagement process, noting several benefits and challenges related to participation. A qualitative narratology approach was utilized to examine the participants' lived experiences. The study used a Saldañas method for an in-depth and systematic analysis of the participants' narratives. Purposive sampling was used to gather ten residents as the participants of this study, employing a bracketing method to gather fair and bias-free narratives during the interview. This study drew the following themes on the benefits of community involvement in government programs: People’s Necessity Access to Knowledge and Information, Collaboration and Cooperation, and Communication Availability. The key themes are also drawn on the challenges that delay the effectiveness of community participation, such as Lack of Proper Communication, Time Constraints and Financial Stability, and Lack of Interest and Political Partisanship. This study also highlights that community participation advances social cohesion and development through Effective and Responsible Leadership in Community Development with stakeholder involvement, Adherence to the Rule of Law and Fair Governance, Transparency, Accountability, and Community Inclusiveness. The findings revealed that community engagement is important in the local government unit as it allows them to be informed and heard about its programs and policies. In this case, communication significantly creates an engaged, inclusive, and empowered community by enhancing decision-making. This underscores that the development of the community through the program and policies of the local government units lies in the effort of the residents to participate. Thus, local leaders should consider a proper channel for information dissemination and key governance principles in promoting community engagement.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2024 APJETPS, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved. For all open access content, the Creative Commons (CC) Attribution 4.0 International Public License terms apply.
References
Adham, T. K. I. (2023). Conflict resolution in
team: analyzing the conflicts and best skills for resolution. Sch J Eng Tech, 8, 152-162. DOI: 10.36347/sjet.2023.v11i08.001
Adlit, M. F., & Martinez, M. R. (2023). Reliving
the Bayanihan Spirit: SPRCNHS Landayan Annex Narratives in the New Normal. Puissant, 4, 781-800.
Akbar, A. (2021). Collaborative spatial learning
for improving public participation practice in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036552226
Amil, A. C. (2024). Implementation of SDG
16:‘peace, justice, and strong institutions in the Philippines: Status, collaborative Efforts, and prospects in International Conference on Public Administration and Social Science (ICoPASS) (Vol. 1, No. 1).
Atienza, M. E. L., & Go, J. R. R. (2023).
Assessing Local Governance and Autonomy in the Philippines. UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES. pp, 1-32.
Aruma, E.O. (2018). Roles of Communication in
Community Development. International Journal of Network and Communication Research, 5(1), 1–10.
Bach, B., Stefaner, M., Boy, J., Drucker, S.,
Bartram, L., Wood, J., ... & Tversky, B. (2018). Narrative design patterns for data-driven storytelling. In Data-driven storytelling (pp. 107 133). AK Peters/CRC Press.
Baltz, A. (2023). What’s so Social about
Facebook? Distant Reading of Swedish Local Government Facebook Pages, 2010-2017. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 17(2), 113 133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2144324
Chhotray, V. and Stoker, G. (2009). Participatory
Governance. In: Governance Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583344_8
Clark, J. K. (2021). Public values and public
participation: A case of collaborative governance of a planning process. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(3), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020956397
Cornell, E. (2024). Lack of Participation in
Local Government. KNIGHTERRANT. https://bsmknighterrant.org/2024/12/05/lack-of-participation-in-local-government/
Diaz, M. L., Lipata, A., Tagacay, M. E., Vigonte,
F., & Abante, M. V. (2023). The Effects of Ayuda Distribution Among Indigent Individuals from the local government unit (A Literature Review). Available at SSRN 4604884. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139.ssrn.4604884
Diokno-Sicat, C. J., Mariano, M. A. P., Castillo,
A. F. G., & Maddawin, R. B. (2022). Local Government Conditional Grants: The Seal of Good Local Governance and the Performance Challenge Fund. Philippine Journal of Development, 46(1), 1-18.
Edwards, A. D., & Jones, D. G.
(2019). Community and community development (Vol. 23). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Garcia, M. L., Mizrahi, T., & Korazim-Kőrösy,
Y. (2022). The complexity of community participation: Professional perspectives on the definition and inclusion of community. Community Development, 53(4), 413-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2021.1959361
Habibullah, K. M., Mohammed, B. U., &
Hamza, M. (2023). Conceptual framework in reflexive bracketing techniques in qualitative methodology. Research Review, 4(02), 849-857. https://researchreview.in/index.php/rr/article/view/161
Hadi, B. U., Zainal, V. R., & Hakim, A. (2023).
Accountability and Transparency of Mass Organization Fund Management In Indonesia. Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(5), 10207-10211. https://doi.org/10.31004/cdj.v4i5.21278
Huda, M., Sudrajat, S., Kawangit, R.M., Teh,
K.S.M., & Jalal, B. (2019). Strengthening divine values for self-regulation in religiosity: Insights from Tawakkul (trust in God). Int. J. Ethics Syst. 2019. 35, 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-02-2018-0025
Iddrisu, M., Aziato, L., & Dedey, F. (2020).
Psychological and physical effects of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment on young Ghanaian women: a qualitative study. BMC psychiatry, 20(1), 353. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02760-4
Igalla, M., Edelenbos, J., & van Meerkerk, I. (2019). Citizens in action, what do they accomplish? A systematic literature review of citizen initiatives, their main characteristics, outcomes, and factors. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(5), 1176-1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00129-0
James, L. A. (2019). Implications and
application of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs in community change initiatives (Doctoral dissertation, Valdosta State University).
Josselson, R., & Hammack, P. L.
(2021). Essentials of narrative analysis. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000246-000
Kamuf, V., & Weck, S. (2022). Having a voice
and a place: local youth driving urban development in an East German town under transformation. European Planning Studies, 30(5), 935-951. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1928055
Kanter, R. M. (2019). The future of bureaucracy
and hierarchy in organizational theory: a report from the field. In Social theory for a changing society (pp. 63-93). Routledge.
Lance, K. C., Kachel, D. E., Breevoort, L.,
Gerrity, C., & Ellis, D. (2023). Voices of Decision Makers: How District & School Leaders Decide about School Librarian Employment. Grantee Submission.
Lansing, A. E., Romero, N. J., Siantz, E., Silva,
V., Center, K., Casteel, D., & Gilmer, T. (2023). Building trust: Leadership reflections on community empowerment and engagement in a large urban initiative. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 1252. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15860-z
Leininger, J., Burchi, F., Fiedler, C., Mross, K.,
Nowack, D., Von Schiller, A., ... & Ziaja, S. (2021). Social cohesion: A new definition and a proposal for its measurement in Africa (No. 31/2021). Discussion Paper. doi:10.23661/dp31.2021.v1.1
Lopez-Rogina, D. (2024). Context Matters: How
Migration Experiences Affect Feelings of Belonging, Exclusion, and Identity for Southeast Asian Immigrants (Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder).
Lublin, D. (2021). The republican south:
Democratization and partisan change. Princeton University Press.
Mandich, G. (2020). Modes of engagement with
the future in everyday life. Time & Society, 29(3), 681–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X19883749
Martinez-Damia, S., Marzana, D., Paloma, V., &
Marta, E. (2023). Community participation among immigrants: A generative journey towards personal growth, International Journal of Intercultural Relations. Volume 96- 2023. 101853. ISSN 0147-1767, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101853.
Maseleno, A., Huda, M., Jasmi, K.A., Basiron,
B., Mustari, I., Don, A.G., & Ahmad, R. (2018). Hau Kashyap approach for student’s level of expertise. Egypt. Inform. J. 2018, 20, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2018.04.001
Onyango, G. (2024). Social processes of public
sector collaborations in Kenya: unpacking challenges of realizing joint actions in public administration. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02176-5
Pasamonte, R. C. V. (2024). Empowering
grassroots voices: engagement of civil society organizations in Philippine local governance. Journal of Public Administration, Public Affairs, and Management, 22(1), 197-197.
Ruess, C., Hoffmann, C. P., Boulianne, S., &
Heger, K. (2023). Online political participation: the evolution of a concept. Information, Communication & Society, 26(8), 1495-1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2013919
Tejedo-Romero, F., Araujo, J.F.F.E., Tejada, A.,
& Ramírez, Y. (2022). E-government mechanisms to enhance the participation of citizens and society: Exploratory analysis through the dimension of municipalities, Technology in Society. Volume 70-2022- 101978. ISSN 0160 791X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101978.
Thakur, D. J., Verma, P., & Sharma, D. (2019).
Influence of leadership style: A review. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(20), 945-952.
Trappert, L. (2022). How to Overcome Common
Barriers to Community Engagement. Socialpinpoint. https://www.socialpinpoint.com/how-to-overcome-common-barriers-to community engagement/
Trappett, L. (2019). 6 Reasons Why Public
Participation and Community Engagement are Important. Socialpinpoint. https://www.socialpinpoint.com/6-reasons-to-participate community-engagement/
Velasco, M., & Ordinario, A. (2024).
Community Participation in the Decision-Making Process. Available at SSRN 5170435. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5170435